A complete Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Research Ethics Committee (REC) submission template following ICH-GCP E6(R2) standards, with region-specific formatting for Singapore (DSRB/NUSIRB), Taiwan (MOHW), USA (FDA/OHRP), and EU (EMA).
Generate free IRB protocol →ICH Harmonised Guideline for Good Clinical Practice — E6(R2) 2016 (current version).
| Section | What reviewers look for |
|---|---|
| Title page | Protocol title, version number and date, sponsor name, PI name and contact, CRO if applicable. |
| Background & rationale | Clinical need for the study, gaps in existing evidence, preliminary data supporting feasibility. |
| Objectives & hypotheses | Primary and secondary objectives stated as measurable hypotheses. Not just "to investigate" — be specific. |
| Study design | Design type, phase, blinding, randomisation method, control arm justification. |
| Subject selection | Inclusion and exclusion criteria written as unambiguous bullet lists. Justify exclusions that limit generalisability. |
| Study procedures | Visit schedule (table format), what happens at each visit, who performs each procedure. |
| Outcome measures | Primary and secondary outcomes with measurement method and timeframe for each. |
| Sample size | Power calculation with effect size, α, β, and assumptions. Justify expected effect size from prior literature. |
| Statistical analysis | Primary analysis method, handling of missing data, sensitivity analyses, interim analysis plan if applicable. |
| Risk-benefit assessment | Enumerate risks (physical, psychological, privacy). Justify that benefits outweigh risks. Monitoring plan. |
| Informed consent | Who obtains consent, when, and how. Language accessibility. Waiver of consent justification if applicable. |
| Data management | Data storage (location, encryption), access controls, retention period, de-identification method. |
| Ethical considerations | Address autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. Vulnerable populations if applicable. |
| Funding & COI | Funding sources and any conflicts of interest for PI and co-investigators. |
Select your IRB system and CliniDraft generates the protocol in the correct format: Singapore DSRB online submission format, Taiwan bilingual headings (人體研究法), US FDA Common Rule (45 CFR 46), or EU Clinical Trials Regulation 536/2014.
Get started free →ICH-GCP E6(R2) (2016) is the international guideline for Good Clinical Practice in trials involving human subjects. It is required by regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, HSA Singapore, TFDA Taiwan) for studies seeking regulatory approval. For observational studies, full GCP compliance may not be legally required, but following its documentation standards is considered best practice and expected by many ethics committees.
A waiver of consent (or waiver of documentation) may be granted by the IRB for retrospective chart reviews, minimal-risk studies where consent would make the study infeasible, or emergency research. The application must justify that the research cannot practicably be conducted otherwise and that subjects' rights are protected. Requirements vary by jurisdiction — Singapore BAC guidelines and US OHRP have slightly different criteria.
Singapore DSRB: typically 6–10 weeks for a full board review, 2–4 weeks for expedited review. NUSIRB: 4–8 weeks. Taiwan MOHW: 4–8 weeks for full review; hospital-level IRBs (NTU, CGMH, VGH) vary from 2–6 weeks. Retrospective observational studies with waiver of consent are often expedited.
Related templates: CARE case report checklist · PRISMA-P systematic review protocol · ClinicalTrials.gov registration